On Thu, 2026-02-12 at 16:10 +0000, Michel Lind wrote:
> On Thu, 2026-02-12 at 00:19 -0600, Maxwell G wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2/11/26 5:22 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 11. 02. 26 20:35, Michel Lind wrote:
> > > > ❯ fedrq whatrequires python3-mock --src | grep -v -f done.txt
> > > > ansible-collection-dellemc-openmanage-10.0.1-3.fc44.src
> > > > beets-2.6.1-1.fc44.src
> > > > compose-utils-0.1.50-15.fc44.src
> > > > gtimelog-0.12.0-9.fc44.src
> > >
> > > Hi. What exactly is in done.txt? I see many more dependent
> > > packages
> > > and am a bit confused.
> > >
> > > $ repoquery --repo=koji{,-source} --whatrequires python3-mock
> >
> > Many of these packages were fixed earlier on Wednesday. The list
> > should
> > be smaller if you re-run your query against the latest f45-build
> > buildroot.
> >
> > > python-hupper-0:1.12.1-5.fc44.src
> > > python-hypercorn-0:0.18.0-3.fc44.src
> >
> > These two have not been accounted for yet. We'll get to them.
> >
> > > python3-debianbts-0:2.8.2-23.fc44.noarch
> > > python3-keystoneclient-tests-1:5.5.0-6.fc44.noarch
> > > python3-music21-0:9.7.0-6.fc44.noarch
> > > python3-octaviaclient-tests-0:3.8.0-6.fc44.noarch
> > > python3-osc-lib-tests-0:3.1.0-7.fc44.noarch
> > > python3-oslo-log-tests-0:6.1.2-9.fc44.noarch
> > > python3-tackerclient-tests-unit-0:2.1.0-6.fc44.noarch
> > We still need to handle the runtime requirements on python3-mock.
> > Michel's query above only included source packages.
> >
> PRs for runtime requirements -- happily in these cases all of them
> are
> just stale manual dependencies
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-debianbts/pull-request/1
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-keystoneclient/pull-request/2
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-music21/pull-request/4
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-octaviaclient/pull-request/3
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-osc-lib/pull-request/2
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-oslo-log/pull-request/2
>
> tackerclient is special - it currently fails to rebuild even without
> the PR due to an unrelated issue, *but* was fine as of the mass
> rebuild. something fails in cliff.sphinxext but the code should not
> be
> failing (and there is no new version of cliff or sphinx between fc43
> and fc44)
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tackerclient/pull-request/1
>
> https://paste.centos.org/view/265d3ebd
>
update: that's a cliff issue with it using Python internal APIs removed
in 3.15 (but also backported to 3.14.3, which caused some confusion)more details in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-cliff/pull-request/5 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/976667 (There's an alternate fix someone else submitted right before me, but looks like it's getting nitted anyway; the one I put in the PR is slightly reworked since upstream cliff is several revisions ahead, the only change is they have type annotations and 3.8.0 does not) -- _o) Michel Lind _( ) https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2 README: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Salimma#README
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
