On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 4:57 PM Mamoru TASAKA <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Steven A. Falco wrote on 2025/09/11 23:37:
> > I tried to upgrade my rawhide VM; it is using the XFCE desktop.  I got the 
> > following:
> >
> > Problem: conflicting requests
> >    - nothing provides webp-pixbuf-loader(x86-64) needed by 
> > xfdesktop-4.20.1-2.fc43.x86_64 from rawhide
> >
> > Looking at the webp-pixbuf-loader I see:
> >
> > $ cat dead.package
> > Not required since glycine replaces it
> >
> > Is there a plan to update xfdesktop to use glycine? (Cc'ing the maintainers 
> > of xfdesktop.)
> >
> > I noticed that the rawhide spins don't have an XFCE iso - perhaps this is 
> > due to the above issue?
> >
> >      Steve
> >
>
> Looks like gdk-pixbuf2.x86_64 should have "Provides: 
> webp-pixbuf-loader(x86-64)" as well
> as "Provides: webp-pixbuf-loader", ref:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdk-pixbuf2/c/696aeff893bd480321e7ecfb41d1a545c3f306d6?branch=rawhide

No, that would be wrong. The package didn't subsume those third-party
loaders - they were dropped completely, so it shouldn't Provide them.

I submitted a PR for xfdesktop that should fix this issue:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xfdesktop/pull-request/2

Fabio
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to