On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 05:37:06PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Nevertheless I do believe if the librpm changed its API then every
> package which _BuildRequires_ rpm-devel should be rebuilt, just to
> check the change doesn't affect them.
Yes, we were primarily focusing on runtime dependencies now so that Rawhide
isn't broken when the side-tag is pushed, however any API incompatibility in
the packages that BuildRequire rpm-devel would just be pushed back to the
earliest moment they're rebuilt in Rawhide by their maintainers.
So I also think that ideally we should try rebuilding those ourselves to
identify potential issues while 4.19 is not yet in Rawhide.
I'll talk to my team on Monday, we'll perhaps do just that. A quick check with
dnf repoquery --release=rawhide --disablerepo="*" --enablerepo="*-source" \
--arch=src --whatrequires rpm-devel
shows a couple of additional packages that weren't covered in this thread so
far:
fastfetch
gcc
gdb
grub2
grubby
javapackages-bootstrap
ocaml-dose3
sblim-cmpi-rpm
xmvn-generator
--
Michal Domonkos / RPM dev team / Red Hat, Inc.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
