V Fri, May 19, 2023 at 12:24:15PM +0200, Michal Domonkos napsal(a): > We're currently preparing an update to RPM 4.19 ALPHA for Rawhide in a > side-tag. The new version features a soname bump: > > librpm.so.9 -> librpm.so.10 > librpmio.so.9 -> librpmio.so.10 > > The following packages link against the above libraries and thus will need to > be rebuilt: > [...] > We would like to kindly ask the owners to issue a rebuild against our > side-tag. > The command to do this is: > > fedpkg build --target f39-build-side-67564 > I rebuild most of the packages <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.19#Current_status> and these I left out:
freeipa - upstream confirmed that no ebuild is needed
rust-rpm-sequoia - I believe there is no dependency on rpm and no rebuild
is needed. Can Michal explain why it is on his list?
rpm-git-tag-sort-1.0-12.fc39 - fails to build for in unrelated reaon.
I have developed a fix and proposed it the
package maintainer and to the upstream.
I can apply it if there will be no action.
annobin - a racing update: annobin-12.10-2.fc39
gnome-software - a racing update: gnome-software-44.1-2.fc39
systemtap - a racing update: systemtap-4.9-1.fc39
This last three already have a build finished in a different side tag or their
update is hang in Bodhi on failed CI tests. I'd like urge their maintainers to
expediate or cancel their updates. I do not want the rpm-4.19 rebuild to clash
with them.
Especially annobin is worrisome because of a cyclic dependency on gcc.
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
