On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Dennis Gilmore <[email protected]> wrote: > El lun, 05-06-2017 a las 07:42 -0400, Neal Gompa escribió: >> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 7:39 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Spec files are licensed under mit license the same as fedora as a >> > whole. >> > >> >> Not always. Most of the time, they are, yes. But if someone chose a >> Free Software license other than that or if the spec file was from >> the >> upstream project, it's usually under different terms. >> >> FPCA guarantees that it'll be MIT if not specified without requiring >> a >> SUSE-style license header at the top of each spec file. >> > > yes if a user chooses to license it under another license they are free > to do so. Not sure I have ever seen that in practice, however given > there is over 18,000 source packages I have not read every spec file. >
Most of the PHP packages are CC-BY or CC-BY-SA, as Remi Collet chose to license them that way. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
