Spec files are licensed under mit license the same as fedora as a whole.
Dennis
On 2 June 2017 3:07:15 pm GMT-05:00, Matthew Miller <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> (Note: pagure can and will enforce the FPCA for dist-git)
>
>I know Richard Fontana has expressed some interest in reducing the need
>for FPCA. Maybe this is an opportunity to move in that direction? I
>know Spot has said that "License In = License Out" is adequate for
>projects on Github; I think Spot's concern with spec files is that we
>don't give them an explicit license (right)?
>
>As we're moving things, can we do something in Pagure to cover this, so
>the FPCA isn't needed here?
>
>
>--
>Matthew Miller
><[email protected]>
>Fedora Project Leader
>_______________________________________________
>devel mailing list -- [email protected]
>To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
