ok for A1 i'm good with named phases and we can modify as necessary. i think the A2.2 solution of directly registering target attrs makes sense to me. is that the direction we're aligned on here?
we can discuss this next week at the community meeting, or if we're in alignment on these two items, i think all that remains is to update the RFC to reflect the discussion here and we can approve/merge. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/60#issuecomment-1130426743 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/60/c1130426...@github.com>
