> Thanks @MichaelJKlaiber, that makes sense. So I was wondering if this is the > case, perhaps in the future this interface is used by other backend's (not > accelerators) we would need to think about renaming UMA to something more > generic e.g. UMB _Universal Modular Backend_ - I'm not the best with names. > I'm wondering if this could easily be done in the future?
@lhutton1, I think for naming there are no limits for creativity, e.g. it could be _UMA: Universal Modular bAckend_ 😄 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/60#issuecomment-1076116867 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/60/c1076116...@github.com>
