[quote="matt-arm, post:13, topic:6727"] Looking forward slightly, I do wonder whether it will start making sense to instead of creating composite functions just directly insert the annotations around the match. This would give us an opportunity to link up ‘composite’ matches with single ops as it’s currently quite unintuitive that these two things are treated so differently. [/quote]
In the PR, we talked about adding a pass that can annotate pattern matches instead of partitioning them. I think it's easy-ish to do. I can start working on it if other people agree this is a good direction to go. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/byoc-use-pattern-language-to-create-composite-functions/6727/17) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubscribe/d9b933524f2baf3a8aa69c8e47c1a122022b1bfba141aac6bf535c0e36732b14).
