Thanks for pointing out. I missed this part in the original post. Currently `MergeComposite` pass doesn't deal with the overlapping issue but let users decide the pattern priority. It means that when performing pattern matching, it should ignore existing composite functions. Is this functionality can also be achieved using `pattern.partition()`?
--- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/byoc-use-pattern-language-to-create-composite-functions/6727/3) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubscribe/4387f64111a288fb2a387533fe412e40dd958bce17dc3731ccf8b243e494c89c).
