I actually use Windows Powershell to execute commands on remote machines,
including stopping/starting Tomcat (and other Windows Services).

This works well for me - but in this case, I have complete control of all
the VMs - and they are not Production Servers.

I used the following articles as reference for creating the Powershell
scripts:


http://www.howtogeek.com/117192/how-to-run-powershell-commands-on-remote-computers/

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6239647/using-powershell-credentials-without-being-prompted-for-a-password


Regards,
Christopher Aguirre

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:

> Alarcón,
>
> On 5/5/15 1:55 PM, Alarcón Vladimir wrote:
> > Hi, for a few months I was wondering about an extension for Tomcat
> > but I'm not sure if there would be interest from the part of the
> > Tomcat team.
> >
> > It's about managing multiple Tomcat servers across multiple machines,
> > from one (or more) centralized location, something like a "Grid
> > Admin". Anyway, the thing is that when you have many Tomcat servers,
> > it could be useful to perform basic operations from a web or
> > command-line interface, so to start, stop, restart, and (sometimes)
> > kill Tomcat servers.
> >
> > My work includes developing web applications and also managing
> > production deployments for clusters of small clusters of 2 servers to
> > clusters of 70 servers, and when you have that many, it's a pain in
> > the neck to manage them one by one.
> >
> > I think I can write a basic proof of concept, but I would like to
> > find out if it's worth it or not.
>
> I'd definitely be interested in such a tool.
>
> It sounds like it would make for a great presentation for ApacheCon
> Europe 2015:
> http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apachecon-europe/
>
> Even if it ends up just being a nice wrapper around the existing ant
> tasks for remote-controlling the manager web application, it would be
> nice. The ant tasks can't bounce a Tomcat instance, though, so
> additional features would certainly be more interesting.
>
> -chris
>
>

Reply via email to