On 26/01/2015 15:31, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Mark, > > On 1/26/15 3:31 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 24/01/2015 19:21, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: >>> 2015-01-24 13:00 GMT+03:00 <ma...@apache.org>: >>>> Author: markt >>>> Date: Sat Jan 24 10:00:32 2015 >>>> New Revision: 1654487 >>>> >>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1654487 >>>> Log: >>>> Prep for next tag >>>> >>>> Modified: >>>> tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/build.properties.default >>>> tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/res/maven/mvn.properties.default >>>> tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml >>>> >>> >>>> Modified: tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml >>>> URL: >>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml?rev=1654487&r1=1654486&r2=1654487&view=diff >>>> ============================================================================== >>>> --- tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml (original) >>>> +++ tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Sat Jan 24 10:00:32 >>>> 2015 >>>> @@ -44,7 +44,9 @@ >>>> They eventually become mixed with the numbered issues. (I.e., numbered >>>> issues to not "pop up" wrt. others). >>>> --> >>>> -<section name="Tomcat 8.0.18 (markt)"> >>>> +<section name="Tomcat 8.0.19 (markt)" rtext="in developent"> >>> >>> 1. Typo: in development >> >> Fixed. Thanks. >> >>> 2. An interesting idea, but release manager would have to remove that >>> text when creating a tag. If you do not mind that extra work, then an >>> item should be added to Release process description in the Wiki. >> >> I'll see how I get on with it. It was a spur of the moment thing so I >> might go off the idea. > > Assuming I'm reading that correctly, it implies that we might be > publishing changelogs *before* a release has actually been rolled.
It is mainly there for folks that look at the file in svn or on the CI server. > I > really like this idea, if for no other reason than the changelog often > doesn't get updated with the latest release date until the *following* > release, which is ... irritating. :) No easy way to fix that. > What about having instead of "release text" or whatever, maybe an ENUM > which contains a few mnemonics like "dev", "release", "votefail", etc.? > That can be validated by an XML validator and the XSLT can produce > standardized text for each status. Not sure how that would help with the most important part which is the date. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
