On 17/10/2013 10:55, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> 2013/10/17 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
>>
>> On 17/10/2013 10:52, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/10/17 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
>>>>
>>>> On 16/10/2013 23:47, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hmm, unfortunately it seems the Websocket implementation using the
>>>>> deprecated proprietary API does not work correctly when using the
>>>>> HTTP APR and NIO connector on Windows...
>>>>
>>>> <snip/>
>>>>
>>>>> With the BIO connector, everything works fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> The new JSR 356 examples work fine with BIO, NIO and APR connectors.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have done some digging and I found that with r1516410, the old
>>>>> Websocket implementation works fine with NIO and APR, but with
>>>>> r1516411, it does not work anymore.
>>>>
>>>> I think the safest thing to do is to revert that change. I think I see
>>>> see a better solution but I don't want to risk yet more regressions.
>>>
>>>
>>> I see this as a cancellation of this vote but I would like to hear your
>>> opinion also.
>>
>> As much as it pains me to say it, I think we need a new tag :(
>>
> 
> Ok
> I can see you already committed the revert.
> Can I start right now?
Hmm. The drawing board WebSocket example is currently broken for me.
Need to figure out why.

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to