On 05/24/2012 04:47 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 24/05/2012 05:19, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 05/23/2012 10:07 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
- apr_time_t *socket_ttl;
- apr_interval_time_t max_ttl;
+ apr_time_t *socket_last_active;
+ apr_interval_time_t default_timeout;
Think we should move both socket_last_active and socket_timeout
to tcn_socket_t. They are always bound to socket and we won't have
to allocate two additional arrays and copying won't be needed since
they will be part of apr_pollfd's client_data
Makes sense to me although I'm unlikely to get to it any time soon.
I'll see if I'll catch some time tomorrow.
On a related note, thoughts on a 1.1.24 release? We are going to need
that for the 7.0.28 release (although that is still a little way off
with 15+ open bugs to fix first).
Next week?
Regards
--
^TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
