On 24/05/2012 05:19, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 05/23/2012 10:07 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: markt >> - apr_time_t *socket_ttl; >> - apr_interval_time_t max_ttl; >> + apr_time_t *socket_last_active; >> + apr_interval_time_t default_timeout; > > Think we should move both socket_last_active and socket_timeout > to tcn_socket_t. They are always bound to socket and we won't have > to allocate two additional arrays and copying won't be needed since > they will be part of apr_pollfd's client_data
Makes sense to me although I'm unlikely to get to it any time soon. On a related note, thoughts on a 1.1.24 release? We are going to need that for the 7.0.28 release (although that is still a little way off with 15+ open bugs to fix first). Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
