> As a reference, Microsoft has dropped IA64... old news, I know... > http://www.pcworld.com/article/193426/microsoft_ending_support_for_itanium.html
OOOPS! Guess that's what happens when you depart the ia64 mother ship; you lose track of even old news. -- Chan Channing Benson Senior Consultant vFabric, Cloud Application Platform VMware cben...@vmware.com Work: 610-328-3691 Mobile: 610-909-7349 On Oct 27, 2010, at 1:57 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 10/27/2010 3:10 AM, Tim Whittington wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org> wrote: >>> On 10/26/2010 11:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I don't have the hardware to test if this is an issue on ia64 this but >>>> the following files have the same MD5 hash: >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.20/binaries/win64/ia64/tcnative-1.dll >>>> >>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.20/binaries/win32/tcnative-1.dll >>>> >>>> That looks suspicious to me. I'd expect the x86 and ia64 binaries to be >>>> different. >>>> >>> >>> Right, this is actually x86 binary, not an ia64 one. >>> Seems I did a wrong upload back in February. >>> >>> Since you are the first one that figured that out >>> after more then 8 months, it just convinces me that >>> we should drop IA64 binaries altogether. >> >> +1. >> I've seen one non HP-UX IA64 system in 10 years, and that was RHEL. >> >>> At least I don't plan to produce them any more > > As a reference, Microsoft has dropped IA64... old news, I know... > http://www.pcworld.com/article/193426/microsoft_ending_support_for_itanium.html > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
