On 21.10.2010 19:05, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 10/21/2010 06:44 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 21.10.2010 18:05, Mladen Turk wrote:
>
I will commit a small change to the release script, that will add the
svn revision number to the end of JK_EXPOSED_VERSION. For me that is
sufficient.
And this would mean that this cannot be used as
a release? So another run, another vote, even
if it works perfectly. What a waste of time. Won't do it.
No, that's exactly what I want to prevent. I want to make it possible to
*not* do another vote, *but* in case we have to do another RC be able to
later find out where code in the wild came from.
Adding to the EXPOSED version does not add anything to the names of
files etc. It is meant to be used only during init logging. That's all.
IMHO we are just complicating something so simple.
I try to find a good solution.
Your observation, that JK_EXPOSED_VERSION is also used when adding the
version as a suffix to the apache version will be fixed soon. Also of
course it was not intended to add "$Revision: xyz $". I intended to add
" (xyz)" and will fix it like that.
What do you not like about it?
Regards,
Rainer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
