On 21.10.2010 18:05, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 10/21/2010 05:58 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 21.10.2010 17:47, Igor Galić wrote:
tags are cheap (:
I know that slogan, but from a users perspective I think "missing"
versions are always strange. It's OK if it happens every now and then
but it give a very strange feeling, if a lot of versions are not
released.
++1
The entire release process (probably for all Tomcat)
should be made with the presumption that RM's
proposals are just that: *the proposal*
Nothing else, nothing more.
Think Mark is already using p.a.o for that, and
I plan to do the same. Before we were using
tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist and this should be axed
completely.
I don't think that was Mark's intention. I would expect him to increase
the version number each time a vote fails and a change in svn is needed
before rerolling. Whether the tarbals are retrieved via /dev/dist or
p.a.o seems not relevant to me.
So I understand, that you also do not want to burn numbers, but how to
do that seems not yet consistent.
I will commit a small change to the release script, that will add the
svn revision number to the end of JK_EXPOSED_VERSION. For me that is
sufficient.
If you want to roll with the script from an RC tag but still use a
non-rc file name for the tarball, the script will need some adjustments.
Regards,
Rainer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
