On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 02/17/2010 07:37 PM, Costin Manolache wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Mladen Turk<mt...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> The reasons I suggest using SPDY as a replacement for AJP - and supporting >> SPDY >> > > I have nothing against SPDY and it really looks cool, > but IMHO it's doesn't look and feel like the rest of RFC > protocol specifications. > If you can push those guys to create a well known RFC-like > doc, I'm sure that overall internet community will benefit > from it. > SPDY is still in development - there is an open mailing list and quite a few proposals/changes/discussions. I would guess the end result will end up as a RFC-like. Feel free to join the mailing list and push or volunteer for anything :-) The implementations - chrome, mod_spdy are also open source and with ASF-like license. > > OTOH we are discussing this 'protocol thing' for years instead like > you noticed we concentrate on the tasks we wish to do. > Think if we start from the protocol side we will stay there (nowhere) > for few more years (although SPDY might be even more then we need). I think what matters is having a working SPDY implementation in tomcat, inter-operable with chrome/mod_spdy/google. If we start with this we'll probably make more progress than by discussing protocols :-) Costin > Regards > -- > ^TM > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >
