On 02/17/2010 07:37 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Mladen Turk<mt...@apache.org> wrote:
The reasons I suggest using SPDY as a replacement for AJP - and supporting
SPDY
I have nothing against SPDY and it really looks cool,
but IMHO it's doesn't look and feel like the rest of RFC
protocol specifications.
If you can push those guys to create a well known RFC-like
doc, I'm sure that overall internet community will benefit
from it.
OTOH we are discussing this 'protocol thing' for years instead like
you noticed we concentrate on the tasks we wish to do.
Think if we start from the protocol side we will stay there (nowhere)
for few more years (although SPDY might be even more then we need).
Regards
--
^TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
