William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Now for me that just makes another chapter in the "STATUS" file:
"PATCHES being discussed". After a week those patches should be accepted
or reverted. Reverted patches and corresponding discussions should stay
in the "STATUS" until a solution is found. I would keep a passing margin
of +3.
A higher bar to add a feature than to release the software? Plainly absurd.
The patches which would be put under review are:
- API or configuration changing patches
- those which are found to be risky, or simply in need of significant
improvements
Features additions are not mentioned in my proposal. We also use a +3
vote for releases.
Rémy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
