Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 5, 2007, at 5:51 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
yes, it is also easily abused by folks who throw around vetoes as
often as I change underwear.
Ouch, that must smell.
I don't see a need to slow down development even further, at this
point if the previous vote is considered valid, we don't even have a
development branch, and a few months of work got thrown out the window
Right, so I guess my own stuff in the sandbox was not even considered,
since the sandbox is sooo not nice enough for your great work :( The
right way to do things is to reach a rather precise agreement before
doing things, and the sandbox is the right place for that.
In httpd and apr-land, sandboxes are mostly single-developer places, where
the rest of the team can see what's going on and review
stuff. trunk is the place where more communal development is done
and where that kind of agreement process is reached.
Yes, it's exactly what I was saying. Trunk is currently based on Filip's
ideas, and as a result it should be moved to the sandbox (which is
somehow characterized as "trowing everything away"; since I was working
on my own stuff in the sandbox, I cannot help but conclude that my own
development was trash, and I was unfortunately right to move it away :( ).
In a regular branch like trunk, I expect collaboration, discussion and
announcements of upcoming changes, etc, which did not happen.
Rémy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
