On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 10:35 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 21/10/2024 12:55, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 12:14 PM Rémy Maucherat <r...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I spent a few days going through the behavior of the WebDAV Servlet, > >> expanding on a test scenario, and looking at the most recent RFC. I > >> found many items to fix. > > > > I continued expanding the tests and found more issues to fix and > > things to refactor. The code coverage is not 100%, but is rather > > reasonable now. > > > >> Three items remain: > >> - Propatch support: it is useless without support for dead properties > >> (dead properties are custom properties, which are basically XML > >> fragments). Since storing them is a major endeavor, I would recommend > >> not implementing this. Also processing of propatch is supposed to be > >> atomic, that would be another implementation difficulty. > > > > I ended up adding an implementation since I figured I needed it to > > make sure it could work (of course, it did not). Verified with Litmus > > from github (and my own added tests). > > Did it make a change to the litmus results? If yes, which ones? > > >> - If header support. The if header is rather convoluted, but it would > >> still be useful to have. > > > > Implemented using some of the Apache Jackrabbit code. > > > >> - Lock null has been removed from the specification and this email is > >> about that. > > > > Done. > > > > Any feedback on backporting the (big) update ? > > I think this makes sense to back port. There is enough variation in > WebDAV implementations without us adding to it.
Ok, in that case, it would be best to stop doing too many commits out of order. The trivial issues would be fixed in turn. Rémy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
