michael-o commented on PR #13: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat-native/pull/13#issuecomment-1194319846
> > and a significantly better build system. > > This is irrelevant, as downstream uses don't worry about build complexity. Build complexity may be a source of other issues, but it's not a good justification for wanting to use one library versus another. I have built both on many platforms. It was a snap to build OpenSSL even on HP-UX. At runtme, this does not matter. > That being said, **I am a big proponent of LibreSSL support** if for no other reason than than to avoid a monoculture. Unfortunately, OpenSSL vs LibreSSL is a bit like comparing modern MS Edge, Chrome, and Opera and saying they are different browsers when they are significantly identical under the covers. Here I do support @ChristopherSchultz. I want to avoid mono culture as well, but all of them are Chromium in different clothes. From a runtime perspective, what is now better with LibreSSL compared to OpenSSL. @ChristopherSchultz You maybe remember that I have started to improve the LibreSSL intergration, but it requires a lot of a time and I don't use LibreSSL. OpenSSL throughout. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
