Thank you Romain, do you then think the place to check for ACME Valve (if
that would the be appropriate naming) would be in
CoyoteAdapter.postParseRequest line 814
before doConnectorAuthenticationAuthorization(...) ?


On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 9:22 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Side note: using a servlet generally does not work if you have any security
> on the webapp + requires a webapp whereas using a valve solves these two
> issues.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le mer. 23 déc. 2020 à 09:15, Mladen Adamović <mladen.adamo...@gmail.com>
> a
> écrit :
>
> > As I haven't received more replies on this topic, I'm guessing project
> > maintainers are not interested in reviewing and including the code for
> > simpler Letsencrypt integration and discussing the mentioned SSL
> > documentation improvements?
> >
> > Enabling AMCE response servlet (good idea by default) would be a good
> step
> > in my opinion?
> >
> > My procedure is explained here:
> >
> >
> https://mladenadamovic.wordpress.com/2016/09/06/configure-tomcat-with-ssl-on-ubuntu-minimal/
> > and the step "Configure HTTP redirect application with support to ACME
> > challenge" could be integrated into Tomcat easily.
> >
> > In the case that is integrated, I can write a new improved
> > tutorial/process.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 11:09 PM Mladen Adamović <
> > mladen.adamo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 6:30 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> It moves the problem elsewhere, how would the CLI communicate with
> > tomcat?
> > >> JMX, HTTP uses a port, a file based communication would be probably
> > worse
> > >> because of perms and other admin issues (and just not working in k8s).
> > >>
> > >
> > > I don't see other sane ways actually. So it seems a web-based manager
> > with
> > > curl is there to stay (for the time being at least).
> > >
> > > To Chris: It's somewhat weird that the user needs a web manager just
> for
> > > curl-ing certification renewal.
> > >
> > > To everyone:
> > > I have a suggestion on improving Documentation regarding SSL.
> > > https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-10.0-doc/ssl-howto.html
> > > Currently, it states
> > > Configuration
> > > Prepare the Certificate Keystore
> > > Tomcat currently operates only on JKS, PKCS11 or PKCS12 format
> keystores.
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > >
> > > I think it should start with
> > > Configuration
> > > Option 1) Use Tomcat Native
> > > which would showcase a path to something like:
> > >
> > > <!-- Define an SSL Coyote HTTP/1.1 Connector on port 8443 -->
> > > <Connector
> > >     protocol="org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol"
> > >     port="8443"
> > >     maxThreads="150"
> > >     SSLEnabled="true" >
> > >   <SSLHostConfig>
> > >     <Certificate
> > >         certificateKeyFile="conf/localhost-rsa-key.pem"
> > >         certificateFile="conf/localhost-rsa-cert.pem"
> > >         certificateChainFile="conf/localhost-rsa-chain.pem"
> > >         type="RSA"
> > >         />
> > >   </SSLHostConfig>
> > > </Connector>
> > >
> > > Option 2) Without Tomcat Native
> > >
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't know what is the formal process for improving the documentation
> > > here?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Le sam. 19 déc. 2020 à 15:24, Mladen Adamović <
> > >> > > mladen.adamo...@gmail.com
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > a
> > >> > > > > écrit :
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 2:29 PM Christopher Schultz <
> > >> > > > > > ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Why not use cron? You can do this with a single "curl"
> > command
> > >> > and
> > >> > > > the
> > >> > > > > > > Manager+JMXProxyServlet.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > We are not using Tomcat manager app.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Why someone should be forced to use Manager, to read/setup
> the
> > >> > > > > > documentation regarding JMXProxyServlet, create an
> additional
> > >> > > > > > servlet (where does it have dependency on?) only to reload
> > >> > > > automatically
> > >> > > > > > certificates?
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > I'm proposing a solution with the simple SSLHostConfig
> > >> parameter.
> > >> > > It's
> > >> > > > a
> > >> > > > > > user friendly. Simple, intuitive.
> > >> > > > > > No need for using manager, no need to create a specific
> > servlet
> > >> > > > somewhere
> > >> > > > > > in your code. Just a single server.xml argument.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Also, *another idea*, I'm contributing this code (see below)
> > we
> > >> are
> > >> > > > using
> > >> > > > > > for Letsencrypt ACME challenge.
> > >> > > > > > Tomcat could also have an option, i.e. in web.xml to
> > >> automatically
> > >> > > > > support
> > >> > > > > > Letsencrypt ACME challenge.
> > >> > > > > > Idea for web.xml
> > >> > > > > >   <servlet>
> > >> > > > > >         <servlet-name>Letsencrypt-acme</servlet-name>
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> <servlet-class>org.apache.catalina.servlets.LetsencryptAcmeChallenge</servlet-class>
> > >> > > > > >         <init-param>
> > >> > > > > > etc.
> > >> > > > > > </servlet>
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > We are using
> > >> > > > > > @WebServlet(name = "LetsencryptAcmeChallenge", urlPatterns =
> > >> > > > > > {"/.well-known/acme-challenge/*"})
> > >> > > > > > public class LetsencryptAcmeChallenge extends HttpServlet {
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >   /**
> > >> > > > > >    * Processes requests for both HTTP <code>GET</code> and
> > >> > > > > > <code>POST</code> methods.
> > >> > > > > >    *
> > >> > > > > >    * @param request servlet request
> > >> > > > > >    * @param response servlet response
> > >> > > > > >    * @throws ServletException if a servlet-specific error
> > occurs
> > >> > > > > >    * @throws IOException if an I/O error occurs
> > >> > > > > >    */
> > >> > > > > >   protected void processRequest(HttpServletRequest request,
> > >> > > > > > HttpServletResponse response)
> > >> > > > > >       throws ServletException, IOException {
> > >> > > > > >     String requestUrl = request.getRequestURL().toString();
> > >> > > > > >     if (requestUrl.contains(".well-known/acme-challenge/"))
> {
> > >> > > > > >       int indexFilename = requestUrl.lastIndexOf("/") + 1;
> > >> > > > > >       boolean wasError = true;
> > >> > > > > >       if (indexFilename > 0 && indexFilename <
> > >> > requestUrl.length()) {
> > >> > > > > >         String filename =
> requestUrl.substring(indexFilename);
> > >> > > > > >         File existingFile = new
> > >> > > > > >
> > File("/tmp/letsencrypt/public_html/.well-known/acme-challenge/"
> > >> +
> > >> > > > > >  filename);
> > >> > > > > >         if (existingFile.exists()) {
> > >> > > > > >           response.setContentType("text/plain");
> > >> > > > > >           OutputStream out = response.getOutputStream();
> > >> > > > > >           FileInputStream in = new
> > >> FileInputStream(existingFile);
> > >> > > > > >           FilesOperations.inputStreamToOutputStream(in,
> out);
> > >> > > > > >           wasError = false;
> > >> > > > > >         }
> > >> > > > > >       }
> > >> > > > > >       if (wasError) {
> > >> > > > > >         throw new ServletException("invalid requestUrl " +
> > >> > > requestUrl);
> > >> > > > > >       }
> > >> > > > > >   }
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > from FilesOperations:
> > >> > > > > >      public static void
> inputStreamToOutputStream(InputStream
> > >> in,
> > >> > > > > > OutputStream out) throws IOException {
> > >> > > > > >         try {
> > >> > > > > >             byte[  ] buf = new byte[32 * 1024];  // 32K
> buffer
> > >> > > > > >             int bytesRead;
> > >> > > > > >             while ((bytesRead = in.read(buf)) != -1) {
> > >> > > > > >                 out.write(buf, 0, bytesRead);
> > >> > > > > >             }
> > >> > > > > >         } finally {
> > >> > > > > >             if (in != null) {
> > >> > > > > >               in.close();
> > >> > > > > >               out.close();
> > >> > > > > >             }
> > >> > > > > >         }
> > >> > > > > >     }
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > *Long*:
> > >> > > > > > > > SSL certificates have a period of expiration and in the
> > >> case of
> > >> > > > > > > > Letsencrypt, it's set to 3 months as they think everyone
> > >> should
> > >> > > > have
> > >> > > > > > the
> > >> > > > > > > > renewal mechanism automatically.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > As the Letsencrypt is the most popular SSL issuing
> > authority
> > >> > > > (source:
> > >> > > > > > > > https://trends.builtwith.com/ssl/LetsEncrypt ), I think
> > >> Tomcat
> > >> > > > > should
> > >> > > > > > > have
> > >> > > > > > > > an integration with Letsencrypt working flawlessly.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > We are currently using the script to renew the
> certificate
> > >> (I
> > >> > can
> > >> > > > > share
> > >> > > > > > > our
> > >> > > > > > > > integration details with whoever is interested, please
> > >> email me
> > >> > > if
> > >> > > > > you
> > >> > > > > > > are
> > >> > > > > > > > interested), but it's restarting Tomcat.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > As Tomcat shall not be restarted ever (ideally), I think
> > >> Tomcat
> > >> > > > > should
> > >> > > > > > > have
> > >> > > > > > > > an option to reload certificate, without a dependency to
> > >> Tomcat
> > >> > > > > source
> > >> > > > > > > code
> > >> > > > > > > > and "hacks" like some available on StackOverflow:
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5816239/how-do-i-force-tomcat-to-reload-trusted-certificates
> > >> > > > > > > ).
> > >> > > > > > > > Those hacks are no good as:
> > >> > > > > > > > 1) code to reload certificate should not run inside Java
> > >> code,
> > >> > as
> > >> > > > > > > > letsencrypt is invoked through Linux
> > >> > > > > > > > 2) each application uses that Stackoverflow hack have
> > >> > additional
> > >> > > > > > compile
> > >> > > > > > > > and run dependency set to Tomcat (which is very bad).
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > I have a proposal on how this should be fixed: Tomcat
> > should
> > >> > > have a
> > >> > > > > > > > server.xml options something like
> > >> certificateReloadAfterDays or
> > >> > > > > > > > reloadAfterDays
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > I see this is moved to SSLHostConfig, we are still using
> > old
> > >> > > > params.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > Do you agree on this feature?
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > If so... I'm not lazy to try to do it myself, but as I
> > >> haven't
> > >> > > ever
> > >> > > > > > > written
> > >> > > > > > > > Tomcat code neither know procedures (I have been coding
> > >> > > > > professionally
> > >> > > > > > > > since 2006, but I never committed to Maven or Git
> project
> > >> > before,
> > >> > > > > lol),
> > >> > > > > > > is
> > >> > > > > > > > there someone else who is keen on doing this feature?
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Have a look at this:
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> http://tomcat.apache.org/presentations.html#latest-lets-encrypt
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > -chris
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> > >> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to