https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55477
--- Comment #15 from Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net> ---
(In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #14)
> (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #13)
> 
> I don't like the approach tying the mapping to the realm as depicted by you
> or Stefan. Consider that a realm is not always bound to a context, maybe
> also be in the server.xml.

Great point. Also, mapping roles "in a realm" ends up mapping them for the
whole context, not just for that one realm.

> I have been using this:
> http://mo-tomcat-ext.sourceforge.net/apidocs/net/sf/michaelo/tomcat/extras/
> listeners/PropertiesRoleMappingListener.html for years. I am not certain
> whether it should remain a listener or should be a new configuration element
> in the context.xml. I think this discussion must happen on the dev list.

A listener seems fine to me. I'm happy to discuss on the dev@ list.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to