https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55477
--- Comment #14 from Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> --- (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #13) > (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #12) > > I am not convinced by that approach. > > Which approach? RealmBase? Context.addRoleMapping? > > > I have provided a possible idea which decoupled from the realm. > > Is there a patch or PR somewhere? Or already committed? > > > I want to pick this up b/c I have am already using a mapping feature. > > Sounds good to me. I don't like the approach tying the mapping to the realm as depicted by you or Stefan. Consider that a realm is not always bound to a context, maybe also be in the server.xml. I have been using this: http://mo-tomcat-ext.sourceforge.net/apidocs/net/sf/michaelo/tomcat/extras/listeners/PropertiesRoleMappingListener.html for years. I am not certain whether it should remain a listener or should be a new configuration element in the context.xml. I think this discussion must happen on the dev list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
