https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63867

--- Comment #13 from Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> ---
(In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #12)
> This is a straight repost from
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60362#c12
> 
> Note that the firmware demands "200 OK", not just "200 foo". I was pretty
> harsh in that other BZ. I still don't understand how the device can securely
> connect to any webserver, thus causing a major security risk for its
> unfortunate users. His only option is to dump the product he paid money for.
> So the reporter claims mistreatment but seems pretty good at doing worse.
> 
> That being said, the reporter will likely be back again two years from now
> wasting our time again about his firmware, so can't we simply add a system
> property with an embarrassing name ? Like
> ADD_OK_REASON_PHRASE_FOR_BROKEN_CLIENTS.

He will be back as soon as Tomcat 10 is out and Spring Boot dumps Tomcat 9. I
surely that he won't have this clients updated by then.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to