https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63867
--- Comment #13 from Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> --- (In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #12) > This is a straight repost from > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60362#c12 > > Note that the firmware demands "200 OK", not just "200 foo". I was pretty > harsh in that other BZ. I still don't understand how the device can securely > connect to any webserver, thus causing a major security risk for its > unfortunate users. His only option is to dump the product he paid money for. > So the reporter claims mistreatment but seems pretty good at doing worse. > > That being said, the reporter will likely be back again two years from now > wasting our time again about his firmware, so can't we simply add a system > property with an embarrassing name ? Like > ADD_OK_REASON_PHRASE_FOR_BROKEN_CLIENTS. He will be back as soon as Tomcat 10 is out and Spring Boot dumps Tomcat 9. I surely that he won't have this clients updated by then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org