ср, 9 янв. 2019 г. в 20:10, Rémy Maucherat <r...@apache.org>: > > Hi, > > So I'm looking at random small items as possible cleanups and ... The > extras came up. > > At some point (15 years ago) the idea was to have a smaller JAR and avoid > bloat, but right now I don't see the point of keeping them out of the > regular catalina.jar (and thus reduce the complexity of the build a bit): > - a listener to configure JMX remote (possibly not as useless as it sounds > for cloud stuff even though they like their Jolokia since it's json) > - some webservices naming factory (ok, so I guess it's not very useful, but > only +15kB or so) > > Did I miss something ? >
1. I think there was a discussion to move CGI and SSI servlet/filter into extras (or to delete them). Nothing pressing here. I do not mind those servlets being present in catalina.jar. 2. I am OK with the changes that you did (moving the classes into catalina.jar). Dropping maven artifacts: some Maven users may be surprised by this, but I think that they can adapt easily. I am OK with this. The documentation needs update as well. E.g. documentation for JmxRemoteLifecycleListener [1] (nightly docs build for 9.0) still mentions catalina-jmx-remote.jar. [1] https://ci.apache.org/projects/tomcat/tomcat9/docs/config/listeners.html#JMX_Remote_Lifecycle_Listener_-_org.apache.catalina.mbeans.JmxRemoteLifecycleListener Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
