Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
6) We could make the interval configurable, but there is a real danger
of users thinking, that a low recovery interval, like 10 seconds would
make things better, whereas it is very likely, that it would make
there whole system kind of oscillate.
Well, I don't wish to limit the users.
If someone thinks that it should retry on the lower intervals,
let him do that.
Yes, but we are doing recovery centralized, that is not every process
does it on it's own. We moved it to global maintenance, so to really
profit in a reliable way from a decreased recovery_time a user would
also need to lower worker.maintain. I'm hoing to addd a few doc lines
about that later today (at least if you are not faster :) ).
Anyhow, why would 60 second be optimal value?
It could as well be 90, 100, 180, etc...
Increasing is something totally different. I just want to avoid people
ending with a system that changes error/ok states with a high frequency,
so that the whole system gets instable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
