I'm OK with your change.
I think we should try to educate the users via doc, that they need to be
careful when lowering these values to very small numbers. I don't know,
if that's the right term, but the system needs some damping to keep it
from switching very frequently between states. At least in most cases.
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Anyhow, why would 60 second be optimal value?
It could as well be 90, 100, 180, etc...
Increasing is something totally different. I just want to avoid people
ending with a system that changes error/ok states with a high
frequency, so that the whole system gets instable.
Right, but why would 60 seconds be an optimal value?
It can be 10 seconds as well. I don't know, cause I
never (and I doubt anyone has) did some profiling
that would tell how that impact the overall performance.
We can only presume and guess, but until someone
gives some real figures, why limiting something we
only presume it might cause problems?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
