cause we have finally reached a stable state, after .16 releases. Its
equally simple to create a new subclass instead of touching and
refactoring the old ones, now that they are stable. Again, both you and
Remy where the ones that 2 months ago said that we don't want to
refactor in the stable branch, so the -1 is still valid.
Filip
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Why not?
I don't want change the complete cluster module.
My goal is that we get a better
ManagerBase/StandardManager/StandardSession base. I want remove
the complete redundant code smell at DeltaManager/DeltaSession. We
have a lot of stress last year with this code duplication.
After the refactoring finished I hope the integration for all
subclasses are become eaisier.
Peter
Am 22.04.2006 um 19:24 schrieb Filip Hanik - Dev Lists:
Peter Rossbach wrote:
I plan to start refactoring that DeltaManager/DeltaSession at
current cluster and new ha cluster are real subclasses :-)
that would be a -1, as we are not refactoring the current impl, that
was the reason for the new modules to begin with. You were the one
who suggested it :)
in the HA module, this is work in progress
Filip
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
