DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-23 01:44 ------- Jonathan, I have one caveat about using the servlet member data for the storing the timestamp of the JSP itself and using it for outdated check instead of using the JSP source and class file timestamps. The problem is that the servlet class has to be loaded in order to retrieve this data. Therefore, you wouldn't know a servlet class file was outdated until you'd already loaded it once (first request). We decided that this 'lag' was ok for dependency checking (which by the way is turned off by default in WebSphere) but did not like this lag for the top-level JSP reloading. As I said, just a caveat. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
