DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-22 18:54 ------- Jonathan, just to clairfy: WebSphere doesn't store the timestamp information in comments - what is stored in comments is informational data that can be used to help debug problems. The timestamps used by the outdated checks are stored in the generated classfile as part of the _jspx_dependants List. If you were to look at the generated .java source you would see, for example: private static String[] _jspx_dependants; static { _jspx_dependants = new String[2]; _jspx_dependants[0] = "/Banner.jsp^1082410708000^Mon Apr 19 17:38:28 EDT 2004"; _jspx_dependants[1] = "/Footer.jsp^1077657462000^Tue Feb 24 16:17:42 EST 2004"; } The timestamp simply follows a dependent's path information. The data in comments the I referred to in post #24 is more this sort of thing: e:/mytempdir/x.ear/y.war/WEB-INF/classes/_ibmjsp/_jsp1.java was generated @ Thu Mar 16 14:03:16 EST 2006 IBM WebSphere Application Server - ND, 6.1.0.0 Build Number: v0611.54 Build Date: 3/16/06 ******************************************************** The JSP engine configuration parameters were set as follows: classDebugInfo = [false] debugEnabled = [false] deprecation = [false] compileWithAssert = [false] etc. etc. etc. Hope this helps. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
