On 3/5/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Costin Manolache wrote: > > Many cases would benefit from more control over memory - hosting or > > embedded or sites with lots of jsps or lots of data. Forcing all > > static content in memory is not the best use of the memory. > > There's no other solution really. Any other implementation will perform > bad, due to the very fragmented nature of static text.
One way to offset the poor performance of having highly fragmented static text would be to only externalize strings which exceed a specific size. This would have the benefit of reducing the number of external references while also reducing the amount of memory used by JSPs. Having this variable tunable would allow end-users to test and tune for their workload. Set it small to reduce memory utilization, set it high to improve performance, or disable it alltogether to keep the existing behavior. -Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
