This is already in done but not implemented by the infra team.
Am 27.01.15 um 07:58 schrieb Mark Struberg:
There are too many false positives imo.
We have a sonar instance at ASF anyway [1].
We should just ask for enlisting us over there
LieGrue,
strub
[1] http://analysis.apache.org/
On Monday, 26 January 2015, 12:49, Oliver B. Fischer <[email protected]>
wrote:
-1 There were thinks reported by FindBugs we would never have seen.
There are still some things to be fixed but currently set to ignore.
Am 26.01.15 um 12:39 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau:
+1 to remove it
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2015-01-26 12:33 GMT+01:00 Anatole Tresch <[email protected]>:
Dear All
basically I like tools like FindBugs, but currently it is a pain. The
Java
8 support seems to be buggy, which creates useless false positives.
Switching rules out is also quite cumbersome, and in most cases the
tool
does not give me feedback, which I would not already have from outside
my
IDE. Checkstyle, compared to, is much more easy. So my question is:
1) Do we really need FindBugs support in our build switched on by
default?
2) Do we need FindBugs at all? If the tool makes you a fool...
WDYT?
--
*Anatole Tresch*
Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead
Glärnischweg 10
CH - 8620 Wetzikon
*Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
*Twitter: @atsticks*
*Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/
<http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>*
*Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79*
--
N Oliver B. Fischer
A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
P +49 30 44793251
M +49 178 7903538
E [email protected]
S oliver.b.fischer
J [email protected]
X http://xing.to/obf
--
N Oliver B. Fischer
A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
P +49 30 44793251
M +49 178 7903538
E [email protected]
S oliver.b.fischer
J [email protected]
X http://xing.to/obf
