See my remark about some very bad and wrong circular dependencies in Java (SE) 8 itself, maybe that could be among the reasons why FindBugs doesn't work there so well?;-)
Werner On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Reinhard Sandtner < [email protected]> wrote: > personally i think findBugs is really great but the build should not fail > - warnings are enough imo but we need to have a much better test coverage > > lg > reini > > > Am 26.01.2015 um 12:39 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] > >: > > > > +1 to remove it > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > > > 2015-01-26 12:33 GMT+01:00 Anatole Tresch <[email protected]>: > >> Dear All > >> > >> basically I like tools like FindBugs, but currently it is a pain. The > Java > >> 8 support seems to be buggy, which creates useless false positives. > >> Switching rules out is also quite cumbersome, and in most cases the tool > >> does not give me feedback, which I would not already have from outside > my > >> IDE. Checkstyle, compared to, is much more easy. So my question is: > >> 1) Do we really need FindBugs support in our build switched on by > default? > >> 2) Do we need FindBugs at all? If the tool makes you a fool... > >> > >> WDYT? > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> *Anatole Tresch* > >> Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead > >> Glärnischweg 10 > >> CH - 8620 Wetzikon > >> > >> *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1* > >> *Twitter: @atsticks* > >> *Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/ > >> <http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>* > >> > >> *Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79* > >
