Kris Maglione dixit (2009-10-05, 14:23): > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 09:19:03PM +0300, Daniel Bainton wrote: > >> No, it's not, as evidenced by the fact that my long-time users are still > >> using it. > > > >Seems like idiots who don't read news about mailing list changes. > > Seems like some of them are smart enough not to follow on the > noise on this list. Most long-time mailing list subscribers don't > follow lists religiously except when they need to use them.
Still I don't see why I should receive two copies of mails because that. If their hairdresser moves one street down one day will they bug the newly moved-in pizza parlour to have their haircut done just because they hadn't been having their hairdos done often enough and without required religious attention? I don't think it's a valid excuse. -- [a]
