Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > Michael Parker wrote: > >> Maybe we should add a --force-reuse that would ignore any msgs that >> can't be reused. > > I'm thinking that should be the only option for reuse. >
This is how it originally worked, but a large portion of the spam traps had never been run through SA so it wasn't all that feasible. So I added in a hack that would swap in and out the regular/reuse configs depending on if the X-Spam-Status header exists. Are folks now running all their spamtrap mail through SA? Maybe we should remove it. Michael
