Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > Random thoughts on frequent re-scoring mass-checks... > > If we do more frequent --net mass-checks we may individually run the > chance of being blocked by the providers of the (URI)DNSBLs such as > Spamhaus. > > Has anyone been blocked to date? Probably not given the once a week > frequency. > > Are the hit-rates of the lists high enough that the results that aren't > cached by the use of --reuse low enough to fall under the block > triggering level? Either way, I guess we should get around to figuring > out a way of caching the non-hits. I'm thinking of a method that > assumes you ran the rules (based on the SA version in the message > header) unless you've specifically told it you don't run a particular rule. > > Should we look at getting zone transfers from the various providers and > hosting a copy on the zone that committers could use? >
--reuse should take care of this. Everyone should save their X-Spam-* headers in their corpus msgs. Reuse sets the rule score to zero so for msgs that it didn't hit, and still have their X-Spam-Status header present we shouldn't be doing any sort of lookup. Maybe we should add a --force-reuse that would ignore any msgs that can't be reused. Michael
