I like the idea of supporting 9x, however it gets difficult to manage
as the codebase diverges.

If we intend to support, we should be completely committed for the
sake of the user community - with guarantees around active backporting
of bug fixes and most importantly security patches. Also, are you
proposing to support 9x until Solr 11 is out?

On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 12:57 PM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:
>
> I'm not opposed to further 9.x feature releases, as long as someone are 
> willing to put in the work. But I don't think such a decision should slow 
> down our move to Java 21 in 10.x.
>
> Excited about 10.0 materializing.
>
> Jan
>
> > 15. apr. 2025 kl. 16:39 skrev Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org>:
> >
> > I think that this is the biggest benefit of the lucene split, and I am 100%
> > in support. 9x can continue being supported while maintainers want to add
> > new features, but there is no guarantee that things be backported (other
> > than security and bad bug) or that releases happen.
> >
> > Other projects do this and I think its a very successful way of
> > transitioning between major versions.
> >
> > Im also excited for a 10.0, and think we should try to cut it in the summer
> > and get all of the breaking changes we want in beforehand. We can
> > prioritize those since we will still be releasing the 9x line potentially
> > going forward.
> >
> > - Houston
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:00 PM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Is it controversial to propose that a 10.0 release need not imply the end
> >> of 9.x minor releases?  I would like us to be okay with additional minor
> >> releases; and I'm not sure why anyone would block this proposal either.
> >> Eventually, practically speaking, too few of us will care about maintaining
> >> the 9.x line, and the minor releases will cease.  Those of us that don't
> >> want to be burdened with another major branch still being open need not
> >> feel compelled to back-port changes there.  Heck; that's true today.
> >>
> >> ~ David
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 9:39 AM Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hey,
> >>>
> >>> Yes - I think penciling in a timeline is a great idea, it'll give devs
> >>> notice around any work that they were hoping to get in.  And July in
> >>> particular sounds like a realistic (if distant) target.  I'd love to
> >>> see 10.0 happen a little sooner if the blockers get cleared away in
> >>> time, but that's probably unrealistic on my part.
> >>>
> >>> Anecdotally, I know some folks have things that they'd like to see
> >>> deprecated in a 9.x release before 10.0 goes out the door.  Is it
> >>> worth penciling in a tentative date for a 9.x release, so those folks
> >>> know when their deprecations/changes need to be in?  Say, early June?
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>>
> >>> Jason
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 3:17 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>
> >>>> I think it's time we start planning for Solr 10. Lucene 10 was
> >>>> released almost 6 months ago and it makes a lot of sense for Solr to
> >>>> release a corresponding version that has all the good stuff from
> >>>> Lucene 10.
> >>>>
> >>>> I would like to target a July release for Solr 10, giving everyone
> >>>> about 3 months - one of which should be to stabilize and test our
> >>>> release for the most part.
> >>>>
> >>>> And yes, I'd like to also volunteer to be the RM.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Anshum
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
>


-- 
Anshum Gupta

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to