I think that this is the biggest benefit of the lucene split, and I am 100% in support. 9x can continue being supported while maintainers want to add new features, but there is no guarantee that things be backported (other than security and bad bug) or that releases happen.
Other projects do this and I think its a very successful way of transitioning between major versions. Im also excited for a 10.0, and think we should try to cut it in the summer and get all of the breaking changes we want in beforehand. We can prioritize those since we will still be releasing the 9x line potentially going forward. - Houston On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:00 PM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote: > Is it controversial to propose that a 10.0 release need not imply the end > of 9.x minor releases? I would like us to be okay with additional minor > releases; and I'm not sure why anyone would block this proposal either. > Eventually, practically speaking, too few of us will care about maintaining > the 9.x line, and the minor releases will cease. Those of us that don't > want to be burdened with another major branch still being open need not > feel compelled to back-port changes there. Heck; that's true today. > > ~ David > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 9:39 AM Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > Yes - I think penciling in a timeline is a great idea, it'll give devs > > notice around any work that they were hoping to get in. And July in > > particular sounds like a realistic (if distant) target. I'd love to > > see 10.0 happen a little sooner if the blockers get cleared away in > > time, but that's probably unrealistic on my part. > > > > Anecdotally, I know some folks have things that they'd like to see > > deprecated in a 9.x release before 10.0 goes out the door. Is it > > worth penciling in a tentative date for a 9.x release, so those folks > > know when their deprecations/changes need to be in? Say, early June? > > > > Best, > > > > Jason > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 3:17 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I think it's time we start planning for Solr 10. Lucene 10 was > > > released almost 6 months ago and it makes a lot of sense for Solr to > > > release a corresponding version that has all the good stuff from > > > Lucene 10. > > > > > > I would like to target a July release for Solr 10, giving everyone > > > about 3 months - one of which should be to stabilize and test our > > > release for the most part. > > > > > > And yes, I'd like to also volunteer to be the RM. > > > > > > -Anshum > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > > > >
