I think a weekly heads up would be great to have. You mention “PR validation doesn’t run BATS tests”…. Maybe it should? We’ve had a lot of churn in the CLI, and we’ll probably continue to have that till 10x comes out, so that would be a nice check. Plus, if we add more integration style BATS tests, why not have them be run on the PR’s?
> On May 31, 2024, at 11:40 AM, David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote: > > I'm concerned that too few people look at the bui...@solr.apache.org > From time to time I go look but we have no notifications other than > emailing that list. > > If hypothetically nobody looked, we might as well not have CI at all; > we'd only have PR based validation. We'd lose out on historic test > failure tracking and detection of introducing a problem that got > merged anyway. PR validation doesn't run BATS tests or "Nightly" > tests. > > Long ago, I recall getting a direct email to me if I contributed a > change to a CI failure. I would like this. I would also like a dev > list email periodically (weekly?) listing the CI job status. > > Any opinions on what to do here? > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > _______________________ Eric Pugh | Founder | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | http://www.opensourceconnections.com <http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether attachments are marked as such.
