May I propose Query Index?

On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 3:03 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It detects documents that match a set of queries, so maybe "detector"?
>
> On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 4:30 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:
>
> > Alerting, while overloaded is probably the most precise name we could
> > choose - documentation would help explain the scope.
> > And if someone made an example project with a UI for experimentation that
> > would make the feature much more approachable.
> >
> > Jan
> >
> > > 2. mai 2024 kl. 03:18 skrev Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org>:
> > >
> > > The functionality is alerts, but that doesn’t mean it has to be a push
> > API. Alerts can be fetched just as easily as pushed.
> > >
> > > I don’t know the limits of this proposal, but LexisNexis needs alerting
> > as we move all of our 114 billion documents onto Solr. I’m retiring this
> > week, so I won’t be around to implement it, but that is one potential
> large
> > customer.
> > >
> > > wunder
> > > Walter Underwood
> > > wun...@wunderwood.org
> > > http://observer.wunderwood.org/  (my blog)
> > >
> > >> On May 1, 2024, at 2:26 PM, Luke Kot-Zaniewski (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A)
> <
> > lkotzanie...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I kind of like "search-alerts". "query-alerts" sounds like alerting
> on
> > >>> query metrics, but IMO "search-alerts" doesn't come with the same
> > baggage.
> > >>
> > >> Someone in the PR had mentioned that "alerts" is a bit off because the
> > proposal does not really manage alerts and it feels too far out of solr's
> > domain. The current approach, much like percolator, simply exposes a
> > request/response API that then can be **used** by an alerting system
> > (request/stream<response> could also be considered if there is worry
> about
> > scaling the number of queries one request can match).
> > >>
> > >>> I think this is certainly something that can start in the sandbox and
> > move> into the main repo once it's clear that there is interest from
> > >>> multiple committers and community members in using and maintaining
> it.
> > >>
> > >> I've seen many homegrown/complex solutions of percolator-type
> > functionality so even this narrower "inverted search" solution has
> **some**
> > use but admittedly this is a niche area. It might not really gain
> traction
> > unless it is marketed the right way as there are probably very few solr
> > users that happen to be thinking about revamping their saved-search
> > platform in any given year. Given that, what do you think I can do to
> reach
> > them? :-)
> > >>
> > >> I am trying my best to talk about this within my firm but the sample
> is
> > obviously smaller.
> > >>
> > >> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 05/01/24 16:16:50 UTC-4:00To:
> > dev@solr.apache.org
> > >> Subject: Re: solr query alerting
> > >>
> > >> I think I'd prefer a more self-descriptive name than "Luwak", which is
> > just
> > >> a product name that was decided a while ago.
> > >>
> > >> I kind of like "search-alerts". "query-alerts" sounds like alerting on
> > >> query metrics, but IMO "search-alerts" doesn't come with the same
> > baggage.
> > >>
> > >> Luwak is fine though if everyone agrees on that.
> > >>
> > >> On one hand we have a number of committers here from
> > >>> Bloomberg, yet the abandoned and now-removed "analytics" component
> > >>> shows that abandonment is a risk nonetheless.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> I don't want to bikeshed here, but I'm not sure this is a fair
> > >> assessment of what happened with the analytics module.
> > >> Sure there wasn't a ton of development, but in general it was feature
> > rich
> > >> and had very little feature requests.
> > >> It was removed in 10, because a lack of user usage, not because it was
> > >> "abandoned" IMO. If there were requests from users
> > >> to keep it or improve it, then it would be a much different story. The
> > >> whole "thrown over the wall" comment is fair, but
> > >> not particularly relevant to this PR, which is being worked on in
> > public.
> > >>
> > >> I think this is certainly something that can start in the sandbox and
> > move
> > >> into the main repo once it's clear that there is interest from
> > >> multiple committers and community members in using and maintaining it.
> > >>
> > >> - Houston
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 2:32 PM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Luwak is good to me!
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 4:01 PM Luke Kot-Zaniewski (BLOOMBERG/ 919
> 3RD
> > >>> A) <lkotzanie...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I love the name "luwak"! I was about to suggest the same but was
> > worried
> > >>> about the trademark concerns and I assumed there was a reason they
> > changed
> > >>> the name when donating it to lucene.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 04/30/24 15:56:22 UTC-4:00To:
> > >>> dev@solr.apache.org
> > >>>> Subject: Re: solr query alerting
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Luwak is the original name of the Lucene monitor, contributed by
> Flax
> > >>> back in
> > >>>> the days: https://github.com/flaxsearch/luwak
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Perhaps we could go full circle (if no trademark issues) to call it
> > the
> > >>> Solr
> > >>>> luwak module? Luwak is a type of coffee, and thus related to
> > percolator
> > >>> 😉
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Otherwise “stored-queries” is an option.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Jan Høydahl
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> 30. apr. 2024 kl. 19:26 skrev David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org>:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I agree the feature is relevant / useful.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Another angle on the module vs sandbox or wherever else is
> > maintenance
> > >>>>> cost.  If a lot of code is being contributed as is here, then as a
> > PMC
> > >>>>> member I hope to get a subjective sense that folks are interested
> in
> > >>>>> maintaining it.  On one hand we have a number of committers here
> from
> > >>>>> Bloomberg, yet the abandoned and now-removed "analytics" component
> > >>>>> shows that abandonment is a risk nonetheless.  I don't know how to
> > >>>>> conclude this thought but I'm hoping to hear from folks that they
> > >>>>> intend to look after this module.  It's not just being "thrown over
> > >>>>> the wall", so to speak.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Naming is hard...
> > >>>>> * ...-monitor-....: sorry I hate it
> > >>>>> * ...-percolator-.... No clue why this was chosen for
> ElasticSearch.
> > >>>>> I can appreciate a curious/non-obvious name like this that is not
> > >>>>> going to conflict with anyone's guesses at what a general name
> might
> > >>>>> convey.
> > >>>>> * "indexed-queries" or "query-indexing" would be a good name?  This
> > is
> > >>>>> the best technical name I can think of.
> > >>>>> *  "reverse search" came to mind (based on the Netflix article)
> > >>>>> although that makes me think of leading-wildcard / suffix-search.
> > >>>>> * "inverted-search"
> > >>>>> *  "indexed-query-alerts" incorporates "alerts" thus might better
> > >>>>> convey the use-case
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 3:53 PM Luke Kot-Zaniewski (BLOOMBERG/ 919
> > 3RD
> > >>>>>> A) <lkotzanie...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi All,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> A few months ago I wrote the user list about potentially
> integrating
> > >>> lucene
> > >>>> monitor into solr. I have raised this PR with a first attempt at
> > >>> implementing
> > >>>> this integration. I'd greatly appreciate any feedback on this even
> > >>> though I
> > >>>> still have it marked as draft. I want to make sure I'm heading in
> the
> > >>> right
> > >>>> direction here so input from solr dev community would be extremely
> > >>> valuable :-)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Many thanks,
> > >>>>>> Luke
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> --
> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book)
>


-- 
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev

Reply via email to