I love the name "luwak"! I was about to suggest the same but was worried about the trademark concerns and I assumed there was a reason they changed the name when donating it to lucene.
From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 04/30/24 15:56:22 UTC-4:00To: dev@solr.apache.org Subject: Re: solr query alerting Luwak is the original name of the Lucene monitor, contributed by Flax back in the days: https://github.com/flaxsearch/luwak Perhaps we could go full circle (if no trademark issues) to call it the Solr luwak module? Luwak is a type of coffee, and thus related to percolator 😉 Otherwise “stored-queries” is an option. Jan Høydahl > 30. apr. 2024 kl. 19:26 skrev David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org>: > > I agree the feature is relevant / useful. > > Another angle on the module vs sandbox or wherever else is maintenance > cost. If a lot of code is being contributed as is here, then as a PMC > member I hope to get a subjective sense that folks are interested in > maintaining it. On one hand we have a number of committers here from > Bloomberg, yet the abandoned and now-removed "analytics" component > shows that abandonment is a risk nonetheless. I don't know how to > conclude this thought but I'm hoping to hear from folks that they > intend to look after this module. It's not just being "thrown over > the wall", so to speak. > > Naming is hard... > * ...-monitor-....: sorry I hate it > * ...-percolator-.... No clue why this was chosen for ElasticSearch. > I can appreciate a curious/non-obvious name like this that is not > going to conflict with anyone's guesses at what a general name might > convey. > * "indexed-queries" or "query-indexing" would be a good name? This is > the best technical name I can think of. > * "reverse search" came to mind (based on the Netflix article) > although that makes me think of leading-wildcard / suffix-search. > * "inverted-search" > * "indexed-query-alerts" incorporates "alerts" thus might better > convey the use-case > >> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 3:53 PM Luke Kot-Zaniewski (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD >> A) <lkotzanie...@bloomberg.net> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> A few months ago I wrote the user list about potentially integrating lucene monitor into solr. I have raised this PR with a first attempt at implementing this integration. I'd greatly appreciate any feedback on this even though I still have it marked as draft. I want to make sure I'm heading in the right direction here so input from solr dev community would be extremely valuable :-) >> >> Many thanks, >> Luke > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >
