Definitely a good thing to add to the docs.  Thanks Gus!

On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 1:24 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ok it seems to be resolved now. I think I'll document this (and some other
> high level info) in the releasing doc I've been working on in SOLR-17244 so
> future release managers don't panic prematurely. Thx for the clarification.
>
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 11:00 AM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hmm if it's this:
> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/solr-reference-guide-official/
> > it's due soon.
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 10:58 AM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Is this done by a jenkins job, (or part of one)? Where can I figure out
> >> the schedule? I tried looking at http last-modified headers, but those are
> >> all over the map and I suspect (guess) those dates may relate to when it
> >> was cached by a caching layer, not when it was built (headers indicate
> >> there's a varnish cache in play (via: 1.1 varnish).
> >>
> >> -Gus
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 12:35 AM Houston Putman <houstonput...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The ref guide gets built nightly by a jenkins job. Either the job isnt
> >>> working or we just need to wait till the next build.
> >>>
> >>> “Beta” is used when the release branch exists but the release wizard step
> >>> of updating the antora.yaml (after the release is done) has not been done
> >>> (or is waiting on the nightly build to happen)
> >>>
> >>> - Houston
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 8:40 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > I was about to send announcement emails for 9.6 but then I discovered
> >>> that
> >>> > somehow the ref guide didn't seem to get the right version, and isn't
> >>> quite
> >>> > working... It lists a 9.6-beta version, which I had noted this
> >>> 9.6-beta at
> >>> > one point but I assumed that since I had never typed the word "beta"
> >>> > anywhere in the process this was automatic/temporary and would get
> >>> resolved
> >>> > as the release wizard progressed.
> >>> >
> >>> > So it's unclear to me how I can fix this. If any prior release
> >>> managers can
> >>> > give me a hit as to exactly what step may have gone wrong LMK...
> >>> Otherwise
> >>> > I'll delay the announcement emails until we have this sorted out.
> >>> (unless
> >>> > the consensus is that I should still send the announcements)
> >>> >
> >>> > The site has been published already, so that's unfortunate. The staging
> >>> > site doesn't show the ref guide or the javadocs so I was unaware of
> >>> this
> >>> > issue till I checked the results of publishing the site live.
> >>> >
> >>> > I'll try to resolve it tonight, but it's getting late and I may be too
> >>> > tired soon.
> >>> >
> >>> > -Gus
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> >>> > https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book)
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> >> https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book)
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> > https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book)
> >
>
>
> --
> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to