Ok it seems to be resolved now. I think I'll document this (and some other high level info) in the releasing doc I've been working on in SOLR-17244 so future release managers don't panic prematurely. Thx for the clarification.
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 11:00 AM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hmm if it's this: > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/solr-reference-guide-official/ > it's due soon. > > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 10:58 AM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is this done by a jenkins job, (or part of one)? Where can I figure out >> the schedule? I tried looking at http last-modified headers, but those are >> all over the map and I suspect (guess) those dates may relate to when it >> was cached by a caching layer, not when it was built (headers indicate >> there's a varnish cache in play (via: 1.1 varnish). >> >> -Gus >> >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 12:35 AM Houston Putman <houstonput...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> The ref guide gets built nightly by a jenkins job. Either the job isnt >>> working or we just need to wait till the next build. >>> >>> “Beta” is used when the release branch exists but the release wizard step >>> of updating the antora.yaml (after the release is done) has not been done >>> (or is waiting on the nightly build to happen) >>> >>> - Houston >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 8:40 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > I was about to send announcement emails for 9.6 but then I discovered >>> that >>> > somehow the ref guide didn't seem to get the right version, and isn't >>> quite >>> > working... It lists a 9.6-beta version, which I had noted this >>> 9.6-beta at >>> > one point but I assumed that since I had never typed the word "beta" >>> > anywhere in the process this was automatic/temporary and would get >>> resolved >>> > as the release wizard progressed. >>> > >>> > So it's unclear to me how I can fix this. If any prior release >>> managers can >>> > give me a hit as to exactly what step may have gone wrong LMK... >>> Otherwise >>> > I'll delay the announcement emails until we have this sorted out. >>> (unless >>> > the consensus is that I should still send the announcements) >>> > >>> > The site has been published already, so that's unfortunate. The staging >>> > site doesn't show the ref guide or the javadocs so I was unaware of >>> this >>> > issue till I checked the results of publishing the site live. >>> > >>> > I'll try to resolve it tonight, but it's getting late and I may be too >>> > tired soon. >>> > >>> > -Gus >>> > >>> > -- >>> > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>> > https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book) >>> > >>> >> >> >> -- >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >> https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book) >> > > > -- > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) > https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book) > -- http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book)
