So the documented blockers are almost resolved, thanks Shawn! Eric decided, for the best, that SOLR-10466 should wait for Solr 9.3.
I'm probably planning on cutting a release later today Alessandro, but if there is a re-spin, I'd be happy to include SOLR-16674. (Or if y'all think it's ready to go today) - Houston On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 1:00 PM Alessandro Benedetti <a.benede...@sease.io> wrote: > I checked internally with my colleagues and it seems that the only issue > that is near the merge point is this one: > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1435 > > Definitely nice to have (also to show progress in the neural search side of > things) but I wouldn't say it's a blocker. > > I assume it will be merged in 4-5 days, it this time is reasonable I can > discuss it with Elia and make it a priority so we include it in 9.2! > > Cheers > -------------------------- > *Alessandro Benedetti* > Director @ Sease Ltd. > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > *Apache Solr PMC Member* > > e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > Consulting | Training | Open Source > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github > <https://github.com/seaseltd> > > > On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 16:58, Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com> > wrote: > > > I am super close on SOLR-10466, barring any issues being raised on > > review. Going to keep pushing this afternoon to get it to done. Only > > thirteen more uses of the deprecated method in the test code, and > honestly, > > since we aren’t deleting this method in 9.2, if I don’t get the remaining > > test converted today, then SOLR-10466 could still be merged. It would > be > > great if folks could review https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1256 < > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1256> and give me a +1/LGTM on the > > work that I’ve done. > > > > For SOLR-8975, there are two other sub issues that aren’t SOLR010466, and > > they are not anything that would block 9.2 going out. Issue SOLR-8975 > is > > also kind of an umbrella issue that isn’t tied to 9.2 either. > > > > > > > > > On Mar 15, 2023, at 10:58 AM, Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > Hey everyone, > > > > > > Trying to get organized around the release. From my point of view, this > > is > > > the state of unfinished work: > > > > > > Looking at the Solr 9.2 blockers ( > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SOLR/versions/12352353), we > > > currently have two: > > > > > > - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168>: It > > looks > > > like this has a patch, that was +1'ed by Kevin, but it hasn't had > > movement > > > since October. > > > - SOLR-8803 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803> > > (assigned > > > to Shawn): This has a good amount of commits, but the comments seem > > like it > > > isn't done yet? > > > I think this is the only thing we can't drop from this release, since > > > there is already a good amount of work done in the 9.2 line. > > > > > > Shawn, do you still want to move forward with both of these for the 9.2 > > > release? If so, do you have a timeline? > > > > > > From this thread: > > > > > > - SOLR-8975, SOLR-10466: Eric, how are these coming along, do you > still > > > want to get them in for this release? > > > - Alessandro, how are your issues coming along, do you think they > > should > > > be merged in.a few days? Also do you have links to the JIRAs? > > > > > > If this is all wrapped up, I'll start the release tomorrow. > > > > > > - Houston > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 1:02 PM Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hey everyone, > > >> > > >> I'm planning on cutting the branch today, and seeing what our blockers > > >> look like. > > >> > > >> Once again, please ensure the JIRAs that must make it into 9.2 have > the > > >> blocker attribute added. > > >> Otherwise I'm going to move forward in a few days, unless there are > > issues > > >> that we see arise. > > >> > > >> - Houston > > >> > > >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 1:06 PM Alessandro Benedetti < > > a.benede...@sease.io> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> I have some issues my team is working on, and we would potentially > > love to > > >>> see them in 9.2 . > > >>> But I don't want to block anything and I suspect they'll get merged > by > > the > > >>> end of this week. > > >>> > > >>> Any estimation for the branch cut? So we may potentially include > them. > > >>> > > >>> Cheers > > >>> -------------------------- > > >>> *Alessandro Benedetti* > > >>> Director @ Sease Ltd. > > >>> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > > >>> *Apache Solr PMC Member* > > >>> > > >>> e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > > >>> Consulting | Training | Open Source > > >>> > > >>> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > > >>> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter > > >>> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > > >>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github > > >>> <https://github.com/seaseltd> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 19:08, Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> I'll cut the branch in a few days, so go for it and merge tomorrow. > > >>> Please > > >>>> do add 9.2 as the Fix Version so that we can track this correctly. > > >>>> > > >>>> - Houston > > >>>> > > >>>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 1:06 PM Andy Webb <andywebb1...@gmail.com> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> hi Houston, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16643 in > progress > > - > > >>>>> would > > >>>>> like that to go into 9.2 if possible, but it's not critical. I'm > away > > >>> so > > >>>>> won't be in a position to merge that until this time tomorrow at > the > > >>>>> earliest. It'll also be my first commit, and I want to make sure > I'm > > >>>> doing > > >>>>> it right! I'm intending to join the Meetup to say hi to folk, could > > >>> chat > > >>>>> about it then. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> thanks, > > >>>>> Andy > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 15:18, Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Hey everyone, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I am officially back and ready to begin the process for 9.2. How > > >>> are we > > >>>>>> doing with regards to blockers right now? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> So I see 4 tickets that are tagged to 9.2 in JIRA but not > > >>> completed. Do > > >>>>> we > > >>>>>> have updates for these items? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> - SOLR-16653 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16653> > > >>>>>> - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168> > > >>>>>> - SOLR-8803 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803> > > >>>>>> - SOLR-16681 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681> > > >>>>>> (mentioned > > >>>>>> above) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I also see work going on for the Lucene 9.5 upgrade. Do we want to > > >>>> block > > >>>>>> 9.2 on this upgrade, or do we want to wait for 9.3? I think I am > > >>>> leaning > > >>>>>> towards including Lucene 9.5 in Solr 9.2, but if we don't think > it's > > >>>>>> feasible we can move forward without it. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> - Houston > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3:49 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I’m ok with documenting it as a limitation as a first step + > > >>> throw a > > >>>>> http > > >>>>>>> 400 error. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Jan Høydahl > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> 1. mar. 2023 kl. 08:21 skrev Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org > > >>>> : > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Hello, colleagues! > > >>>>>>>> How can we triage > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681 > > >>>>>>>> Replacing uniqueKey field via fl doesn't work since 9.0? > > >>>>>>>> I don't have an elegant solution. Will we just declare it as a > > >>>> known > > >>>>>>>> bug/limitation? > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:07 PM Houston Putman < > > >>>> hous...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Hey everyone, > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a > > >>> ton > > >>>> of > > >>>>>>> great > > >>>>>>>>> things to show off in 9.2: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> - Jetty 10 > > >>>>>>>>> - JAX-RS > > >>>>>>>>> - Lucene 9.5 > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I volunteer to do the release starting in the week of March > > >>> 6th, > > >>>>>> unless > > >>>>>>>>> anyone else objects or wants to do it themselves. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> - Houston > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>> Sincerely yours > > >>>>>>>> Mikhail Khludnev > > >>>>>>>> https://t.me/MUST_SEARCH > > >>>>>>>> A caveat: Cyrillic! > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > _______________________ > > Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | > > http://www.opensourceconnections.com < > > http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy < > > http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> > > Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed < > > > https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw > > > > > > This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be > > Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of > > whether attachments are marked as such. > > > > >
