Hey everyone, I am officially back and ready to begin the process for 9.2. How are we doing with regards to blockers right now?
So I see 4 tickets that are tagged to 9.2 in JIRA but not completed. Do we have updates for these items? - SOLR-16653 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16653> - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168> - SOLR-8803 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803> - SOLR-16681 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681> (mentioned above) I also see work going on for the Lucene 9.5 upgrade. Do we want to block 9.2 on this upgrade, or do we want to wait for 9.3? I think I am leaning towards including Lucene 9.5 in Solr 9.2, but if we don't think it's feasible we can move forward without it. - Houston On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3:49 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: > I’m ok with documenting it as a limitation as a first step + throw a http > 400 error. > > Jan Høydahl > > > 1. mar. 2023 kl. 08:21 skrev Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org>: > > > > Hello, colleagues! > > How can we triage https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681 > > Replacing uniqueKey field via fl doesn't work since 9.0? > > I don't have an elegant solution. Will we just declare it as a known > > bug/limitation? > > > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:07 PM Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > >> Hey everyone, > >> > >> It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a ton of > great > >> things to show off in 9.2: > >> > >> - Jetty 10 > >> - JAX-RS > >> - Lucene 9.5 > >> > >> I volunteer to do the release starting in the week of March 6th, unless > >> anyone else objects or wants to do it themselves. > >> > >> - Houston > >> > > > > > > -- > > Sincerely yours > > Mikhail Khludnev > > https://t.me/MUST_SEARCH > > A caveat: Cyrillic! > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >
