Providing maven artifacts is ok provided the jars embed LICENSE and NOTICE files as required. The release artifact we vote on will be the source tarball though.
> On Sep 20, 2016, at 2:41 PM, Donald Szeto <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > What if the set of artifacts are built from the source tarball, and they > are an integral part of the ecosystem (e.g. PredictionIO engine developers > use these artifacts to build engines)? > > I read from > http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#stage-release-vote > that we need to have RC artifacts on Nexus for voters to test? > > Regards, > Donald > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> The release artifact should be one signed and summed tarball. >> >>> On Sep 20, 2016, at 10:36 AM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> that was my thinking too, hence I have been holding off from even >>> downloading any of the artifacts. >>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Pat Ferrel <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> Shouldn’t this be one tarball? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sep 18, 2016, at 6:53 PM, Donald Szeto <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Yes. Many of them are sources, docs, poms and signatures though. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected] >>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> So all of these artifacts need to be verified and validated ? >>>>> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >>>>> orgapachepredictionio-1003/org/apache/predictionio/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Donald Szeto <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I will start a new voting thread. The staging repo should contain just >>>>>> PredictionIO artifacts. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> the MAven staging repo brings up whole load of artifacts, which ones >> r >>>>> we >>>>>>> voting on again ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Donald Szeto <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have prepared a RC2. The artifacts can be downloaded here: >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ >>>>> predictionio/0.10.0- >>>>>>>> incubating-rc2/ >>>>>>>> or from the Maven staging repo here: >>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >>>>>>>> orgapachepredictionio-1003/ >>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do we need to vote on the RC2 again? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Pat Ferrel <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hate to make more work for you but the new name would also maybe >>>>>> avoid >>>>>>>>> some confusion for older migrating users. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sep 16, 2016, at 9:02 AM, Donald Szeto <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If everyone agrees that the artifacts should have an "apache-" >>>>>> prefix, >>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>> will roll an RC2 shortly. Since the namespace change is >>>>> unavoidable, >>>>>>>> might >>>>>>>>> as well get all artifact name changes done in one shot for good. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Friday, September 16, 2016, Andrew Purtell < >>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Let me double check. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 16, 2016, at 7:33 AM, Alex Merritt < >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I believe it depends on which of the two votes you mean. For the >>>>>>>> podling >>>>>>>>>>> vote, PPMC votes are binding, for the incubator vote, IPMC >>>>> votes >>>>>>> are, >>>>>>>>>> no? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 15, 2016 9:42 PM, "Andrew Purtell" < >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I believe 'binding' only applies to IPMC. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 15, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Suneel Marthi < >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, When u vote please specify "+1 Binding" if u r a PMC >>>>>>> member. >>>>>>>>> Its >>>>>>>>>>>>> only the PMC votes that count for a release to pass. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Robert Lu < >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 15, 2016, at 01:13, Matthew Tovbin < >>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Pat Ferrel < >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Donald Szeto < >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the vote for 0.10.0 of Apache PredictionIO >>>>>>> (incubating). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will run for at least 72 hours and will close on >>>>>> Sept >>>>>>>>> 16th, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >>>>> dist/dev/incubator/predictioni >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> o/0.10.0-incubating-rc1/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the Maven staging repo here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/ >>>>> content/repositories/orgapache >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> predictionio-1001/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All JIRAs completed for this release are tagged with >>>>>>> 'FixVersion >>>>>>>> = >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.10.0'. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can view them here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? >>>>> proje >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12320420&version=12337844 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The artifacts have been signed with Key : 8BF4ABEB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote accordingly: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.10.0 release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.10.0 release >>>>>>>> because... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>
